000			01220nab a22002057a 4500
005			20180310102022.0
008			180310b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aPH-MaPUP
100	1		_aJimenez-David, Rina _912012
222			_aPhilippine Daily Inquirer
245	0	0	_aSad history of the 'Supremes' / _cRina Jimenez-David
264	0	0	_aMakati City : _bPhilippine Daily Inquirer, _c2018.
300			_apage A13
520	2		_aTime was when the Supreme Court and the magistrates who belonged to it — known by the cheeky designation of the “Supremes” — was beheld with utter respect if not outright awe by the common people. Known as the final arbiter of law and justice, the Supreme Court was a destination every lawyer eyed with moist eyes, the pinnacle of every law student’s and lawyer’s ambition. To sit in the Supreme Court was to belong to the elite of elites, to preside over one’s peers in the same profession with the stature of a demigod, an unimpeachable, blameless superior being.
650			_bImpeachment. _915320
650			_bSupreme court. _913066
856			_3View the Article _uhttp://opinion.inquirer.net/111543/sad-history-supremes
859			_cMLD
942			_2lcc _cNP
999			_c58465 _d58465