Anti-terror law constitutional except for two parts, says SC / Tetch Torres-Tupas.
By: Torres-Tupas, Tetch [author].
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: Makati : Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2021Subject(s): Republic Act 11479 Anti-Terrorism Act | Constitutional | Supreme Court of the PhilippinesOnline resources: View the Article Abstract: MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court declares as unconstitutional two portions of the feared Republic Act 11479 or the Anti-Terrorism Act.
In an advisory issued by the Public Information Office (PIO), voting 12-3, the High Court strikes down for being overbroad and violative of freedom of expression the qualifier portion of Section 4 stating that “…which are not intended to cause death or serious physical harm to a person, to endanger a person’s life, or to create a serious risk to public safety.”
Read more: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1525096/anti-terror-law-constitutional-except-for-two-parts-says-sc#ixzz7EWw3AeDt
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
News Paper
|
Main Library: Serials Section | Philippine Daily Inquirer, December 9, 2021 (Browse shelf) | Available | NP10242 |
MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court declares as unconstitutional two portions of the feared Republic Act 11479 or the Anti-Terrorism Act.
In an advisory issued by the Public Information Office (PIO), voting 12-3, the High Court strikes down for being overbroad and violative of freedom of expression the qualifier portion of Section 4 stating that “…which are not intended to cause death or serious physical harm to a person, to endanger a person’s life, or to create a serious risk to public safety.”
Read more: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1525096/anti-terror-law-constitutional-except-for-two-parts-says-sc#ixzz7EWw3AeDt
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
There are no comments for this item.